Wed 30 May 2007
Who Remembers Ernestine Huckleby?
Posted by brooklinemama under natural world , pain and illness , photographs- A photograph
I was leafing through an old National Geographic compilation book called As We Live and Breathe, The Challenge of Our Environment, when I chanced upon a two-page spread devoted to the Huckleby family and a large photograph that took my breath away. I reproduce it here, not knowing who the photographer or copyright holder is.

This is Ernestine Huckleby.
- Ernestine’s story
In 1969, in Alamogordo, New Mexico, her family sat down to a meal of pork from a hog they had raised themselves. A year earlier, the pig had been fed grains that were not meant for consumption (animal or human), but only for planting more grains. They had been treated with the pesticide Panogen, which contained methyl mercury.
Though all the family members showed high doses of mercury in their bodies, only three of the childen were severely affected. There is conflicting information on the web. The most repeated story is that “one was deafened, another was blinded, a third arrived at the hospital raving mad.” The photographs in the National Geographic book paint a more complex picture: a young woman (Dorothy Jean Huckleby) learning to walk with crutches, and a teenager (Amos Charles), blind but learning to speak again. Of the little girl, whose age I can’t ascertain, the book says “Blinded, mute, her hearing and powers of movement severely impaired, Ernestine Huckleby clings to life”. There also seems to have been a baby still in utero when her mother ate the pork, and she was born with a severely damaged central nervous system.
- Iconized and forgotten
Back in 1970, when the story made national headlines, it forced the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to ban and recall all mercury-containing pesticides. Today “the Huckleby Poisoning” still stands as one of the icons for the innocents who are harmed by environmental destruction in the interest of commercial gain and under the “watchful” eye of the government.
But Ernestine, she is forgotten.
When you Google “Ernestine Huckleby”, you get one irrelevant search result. The web, where everyone lives nowadays, does not acknowledge her.
This iconization is a good thing: such images stick in our minds and move our hearts like no theory, accumulation of scientific data or political manifesto can. They make us think, feel, speak out. But does it have to come at such a price?
- Dreaming of Ernestine
The world snapped a picture. The face became an icon. It discarded the little girl behind it, behind those eyes.
Tonight I will dream of Ernestine, dancing and skipping, singing and laughing. Then I will dream about the world slamming shut on her. Is she still there, in that little girl clutching the stuffed animal with the pink bow? It is terrible to admit it: I hope not. I hope Ernestine too forgot herself. The alternative is simply too horrific.
Update: more of Ernestine’s story here.
June 3rd, 2007 at 10:33 pm
Maybe she recovered? I don’t know. But that too is something to hope for? But you’re right, we should be reminded of these stories as well as of the real people behind them. Let us know if you find something!
June 10th, 2007 at 5:09 pm
I first read this case in law school this year. Know that in 2007, this case is still alive and well in the Products Liability context under the deterrence rationale.
The case sums it up like this:
“Allowing injured plaintiffs to proceed on a theory of a manufacturer’s liability, without the necessity of proving negligence, will cause manufacturers to take cautionary steps to prevent the marketing of dangerously defective products.”
June 13th, 2007 at 11:05 am
Thanks, William, for the information. It is good to know that Ernestine still functions as an icon - a deterrent, as you say. Do you happen to know what happened to *her*, though? Is there any information about that in the law books?